Newsroom

Thursday, September 3, 2026 - 1:05pm
30
Commentary on the Report of MIT’s Ad Hoc Committee on AI Use in Teaching, Learning, and Research Training

This commentary aims to share CEM's critical insights on MIT's AI report and contribute to the ongoing discourse on integrating artificial intelligence into teaching, learning, and research.

“The goal is not to shield students from AI, nor to preserve older educational forms for their own sake. It is to ensure that AI use supports the development of people who can think critically, act with initiative, work productively with others, and understand the consequences of their choices in a world shared with nine billion other human beings.”

This line from MIT’s report on AI in teaching, learning, and research training captures the challenge before educators today: AI is not merely a shortcut to faster work. It is a powerful force that must be guided by the deeper purposes of education.

Rather than keeping AI out of students’ learning experiences or holding on to traditional teaching practices simply because they feel familiar, we need to help students engage with AI wisely. Students will encounter AI far beyond the classroom, so they need to learn how to use it with integrity, accountability, honesty, and critical judgment.

For educators, this calls for bold but thoughtful action. We need to build AI literacy among teachers and learners so that AI can help address learning gaps, support more equitable classroom experiences, and expand access to meaningful feedback and resources.

At the same time, we must protect what is deeply human in learning. AI may sound human, but it does not empathize, take responsibility, or understand the moral weight of choices. Education must continue to nurture people who can think critically, act with initiative, work with others, and understand the consequences of their decisions in a shared world.

This is why the principle of augmentation, not automation, matters. AI should extend learning, not replace the thinking, reasoning, and problem-solving that students need to develop.

Assessment, therefore, must also evolve. In an AI-enabled world, good assessment should make the learning we value visible: reasoning, application, discussion, creation, reflection, and demonstration. We should look beyond the answer and ask: What did the learner understand? How did they arrive at it? Can they explain, apply, evaluate, and build on it?

AI may change how students learn and how they show what they know, but our responsibility remains the same: to gather credible evidence that learning has truly taken place—and to ensure that technology serves humanity, not the other way around.

 

Access Full MIT Report Here: 
https://aiandeducation.mit.edu/report/